Core M-5Y10 vs Pentium G2010

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y10 vs Pentium G2010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y10 vs Pentium G2010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 25.6 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
❌830.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 55W.

Pentium G2010

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $217 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.6 vs 5.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 512W, a 457W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,641 vs 1,644).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G2010 better than Core M-5Y10?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G2010 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core M-5Y10 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G2010 is the better buy right now. Pentium G2010 comes in $217 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core M-5Y10 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 338.3% better value on MSRP (25.6 vs 5.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core M-5Y10 vs Pentium G2010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G2010

The Pentium G2010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,641 points. Launch price was $466.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y10 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G2010's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G2010 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G2010 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core M-5Y10 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G2010 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10 scores 1,644 against the Pentium G2010's 1,641 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y10. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10 vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2010.

Feature	Core M-5Y10	Pentium G2010
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock	0.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+250%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-Y (2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,644	1,641

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y10 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2010 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core M-5Y10	Pentium G2010
Socket	FCBGA1234	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core M-5Y10 was priced at $281, while the Pentium G2010 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($281 vs $64), Pentium G2010 was $217 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10 delivers 5.9 pts/$ vs 25.6 pts/$ for the Pentium G2010 — making the Pentium G2010 the 125.7% better value option.

Feature	Core M-5Y10	Pentium G2010
MSRP	$281	$64-77%
Performance per Dollar	5.9	25.6+334%
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core M-5Y10 on Amazon

Search Pentium G2010 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.