Core M-5Y10
VS
Pentium G2010

Core M-5Y10 vs Pentium G2010

Intel

Core M-5Y10

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium G2010

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y10 is positioned at rank 1190 and the Pentium G2010 is on rank 669, so the Pentium G2010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y10

#1178
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5015%
#1179
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4942%
#1180
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4537%
#1181
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4516%
#1182
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4475%
#1184
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4321%
#1185
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4144%
#1186
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4137%
#1187
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4026%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
100%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
96%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
96%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
91%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
90%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
90%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
90%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
87%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
87%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G2010

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12157%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11488%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8341%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2513%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1990%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1741%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
997%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
984%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
896%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
896%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
886%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
862%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
850%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
847%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
839%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
100%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
#671
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#674
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
100%
#675
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#677
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#678
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
99%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G2010 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core M-5Y10 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore M-5Y10Pentium G2010
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium G2010 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 75% cheaper ($5 vs $20) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore M-5Y10Pentium G2010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+299%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y10 and Pentium G2010

Intel

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium G2010

The Pentium G2010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3072 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,641 points. Launch price was $466.

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y10 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G2010's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G2010 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G2010 (base: 0.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core M-5Y10 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G2010 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y10 scores 1,644 against the Pentium G2010's 1,641 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y10. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10 vs 3072 kB (total) on the Pentium G2010.

FeatureCore M-5Y10Pentium G2010
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.8 GHz+40%
Base Clock
0.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+250%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3072 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,644
1,641
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y10 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G2010 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore M-5Y10Pentium G2010
Socket
FCBGA1234
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core M-5Y10 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Pentium G2010 debuted at $64. At current prices ($20 vs $5), the Pentium G2010 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y10 delivers 82.2 pts/$ vs 328.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G2010 — making the Pentium G2010 the 119.9% better value option.

FeatureCore M-5Y10Pentium G2010
MSRP
$281
$64-77%
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$5-75%
Performance per Dollar
82.2
328.2+299%
Release Date
2014
2013