Core m3-7Y32 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y32

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2403 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 9.6 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,672 vs 2,697).
❌1677.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y32 better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core m3-7Y32 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y32 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y32 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2403 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core m3-7Y32 comes in 46.4% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2403 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2403 v2 is also 45.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 9.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m3-7Y32 vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 50% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y32 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.9% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 v2.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+67%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.8 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	4 MB	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,697	2,672

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Socket	FCBGA1515	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	384 GB
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-7Y32) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m3-7Y32 was priced at $281, while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 came in at $192. On launch pricing ($281 vs $192), Xeon E5-2403 v2 was $89 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y32 delivers 9.6 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2403 v2 the 36.7% better value option.

Feature	Core m3-7Y32	Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP	$281	$192-32%
Performance per Dollar	9.6	13.9+45%
Release Date	2017	2013

Search Core m3-7Y32 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2403 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.