Core m5-6Y57 vs Pentium G4400T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Pentium G4400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Pentium G4400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 36.3 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G4400T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $217 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 335.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.3 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,323 vs 2,342).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m5-6Y57 better than Pentium G4400T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4400T is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core m5-6Y57 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m5-6Y57 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core m5-6Y57 comes in 339.1% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Pentium G4400T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 335.5% better value on paper (36.3 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m5-6Y57 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Pentium G4400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium G4400T

The Pentium G4400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,323 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4400T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4400T — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Pentium G4400T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G4400T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Pentium G4400T's 2,323 — a 0.8% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Pentium G4400T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.9 GHz+164%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,342	2,323

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Pentium G4400T
Socket	FCBGA1515	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m5-6Y57 was priced at $281, while the Pentium G4400T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($281 vs $64), Pentium G4400T was $217 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y57 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 36.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G4400T — making the Pentium G4400T the 125.3% better value option.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Pentium G4400T
MSRP	$281	$64-77%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	36.3+337%
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core m5-6Y57 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4400T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.