Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i3-3240
Core m7-6Y75
Core i3-3240
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m7-6Y75 is positioned at rank 1189 and the Core i3-3240 is on rank 847, so the Core i3-3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m7-6Y75 | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m7-6Y75 | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2508%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m7-6Y75 and Core i3-3240
Core m7-6Y75
The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.
Core i3-3240
The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
Both the Core m7-6Y75 and Core i3-3240 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3240 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Core i3-3240's 2,352 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+183% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,363 | 2,352 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core m7-6Y75 launched at $393 MSRP, while the Core i3-3240 debuted at $132. At current prices ($393 vs $15), the Core i3-3240 is $378 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 156.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-3240 — making the Core i3-3240 the 185.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $132-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $393 | $15-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 156.8+2513% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m7-6Y75 and Core i3-3240
