
Core m7-6Y75

Pentium P6200
Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core m7-6Y75
2015Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,394).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium P6200
2010Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $333 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 563.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.9 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium P6200 better than Core m7-6Y75?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m7-6Y75
The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Pentium P6200
The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Core m7-6Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium P6200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+2285% | 0.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.13 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,363 | 2,394+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 400 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m7-6Y75) / None (Pentium P6200). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core m7-6Y75 was priced at $393, while the Pentium P6200 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($393 vs $60), Pentium P6200 was $333 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 39.9 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Pentium P6200 the 147.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $60-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 39.9+565% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














