Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium P6200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,394).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Pentium P6200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $333 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
  • Delivers 563.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.9 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium P6200 better than Core m7-6Y75?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core m7-6Y75 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core m7-6Y75 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium P6200 is the better buy right now. Pentium P6200 comes in $333 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core m7-6Y75 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 563.6% better value on MSRP (39.9 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Pentium P6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Intel

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Core m7-6Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium P6200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Pentium P6200
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+2285%
0.13 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.13 GHz+78%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,363
2,394+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Pentium P6200
Socket
FCBGA1515
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m7-6Y75) / None (Pentium P6200). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Pentium P6200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m7-6Y75 was priced at $393, while the Pentium P6200 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($393 vs $60), Pentium P6200 was $333 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 39.9 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Pentium P6200 the 147.6% better value option.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Pentium P6200
MSRP
$393
$60-85%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
39.9+565%
Release Date
2015
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.