Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E3-1220L v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E3-1220L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E3-1220L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 2,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $393 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1220L v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2911.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 17W.

Xeon E3-1220L v2

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 512W, a 495W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1220L v2 better than Core m7-6Y75?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1220L v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core m7-6Y75 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1220L v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1220L v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1220L v2 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E3-1220L v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $393 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m7-6Y75 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 1.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core m7-6Y75 vs Xeon E3-1220L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Xeon E3-1220L v2

The Xeon E3-1220L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core m7-6Y75 and Xeon E3-1220L v2 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220L v2 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220L v2 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220L v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Xeon E3-1220L v2's 2,397 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1220L v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220L v2.

Feature	Core m7-6Y75	Xeon E3-1220L v2
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.3 GHz+92%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,363	2,397+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220L v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.