Core m7-6Y75
VS
Phenom II X4 840T

Core m7-6Y75 vs Phenom II X4 840T

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 840T

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m7-6Y75 is positioned at rank 1189 and the Phenom II X4 840T is on rank 265, so the Phenom II X4 840T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75

#1177
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4882%
#1178
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4810%
#1179
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4416%
#1180
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4396%
#1181
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4356%
#1183
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4206%
#1184
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4033%
#1185
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4027%
#1186
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3918%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
100%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
97%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
94%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
93%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
91%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
89%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
88%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
88%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
85%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 840T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
3951%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3733%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
817%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
647%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
566%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
324%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
320%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
291%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
291%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
288%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
280%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
276%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
275%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
273%
#251
Core i3-10300T
MSRP: $157|Avg: $100
100%
#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
100%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
99%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
99%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
99%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
98%
#257
Core i9-14900
MSRP: $524|Avg: $589
98%
#258
Core i5-8600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $130
97%
#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
97%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
97%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
96%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
95%
#265
Phenom II X4 840T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Phenom II X4 840T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core m7-6Y75 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m7-6Y75Phenom II X4 840T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zosma (2010−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore m7-6Y75Phenom II X4 840T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m7-6Y75 and Phenom II X4 840T

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

AMD

Phenom II X4 840T

The Phenom II X4 840T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Zosma (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Core m7-6Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 840T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 840T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 840T — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 840T (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 840T uses Zosma (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Phenom II X4 840T's 2,367 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X4 840T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 840T.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Phenom II X4 840T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+3%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+142%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Zosma (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,363
2,367
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 840T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Phenom II X4 840T
Socket
FCBGA1515
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0