
Core m7-6Y75

Ryzen 5 5600X
Core m7-6Y75 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core m7-6Y75 vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core m7-6Y75 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core m7-6Y75
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,363 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +287.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $94 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1115.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Core m7-6Y75?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m7-6Y75 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m7-6Y75
The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core m7-6Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 — a 161% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.6 GHz+48% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+208% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 2,363 | 21,845+824% |
Memory & Platform
The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m7-6Y75) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core m7-6Y75 was priced at $393, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($393 vs $299), Ryzen 5 5600X was $94 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 169.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $299-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 73.1+1118% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














