Core m7-6Y75
VS
Core i5-661

Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i5-661

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-661

2 Cores4 Thrd87 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m7-6Y75 is positioned at rank 1189 and the Core i5-661 is on rank 959, so the Core i5-661 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75

#1177
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4882%
#1178
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4810%
#1179
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4416%
#1180
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4396%
#1181
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4356%
#1183
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4206%
#1184
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4033%
#1185
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4027%
#1186
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3918%
#1189
Core m7-6Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $393
100%
#1190
Core M-5Y10
MSRP: $281|Avg: $20
97%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
94%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
93%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
91%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
89%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
88%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
88%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
85%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-661

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25592%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24182%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17558%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5290%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4190%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3665%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2099%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2072%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1887%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1886%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1865%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1815%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1790%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1782%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1766%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
100%
#960
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
100%
#961
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
100%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
99%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
98%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
98%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
97%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
97%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
96%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
96%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
96%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
95%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
95%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-661 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core m7-6Y75 in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m7-6Y75Core i5-661
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
More affordable ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-661 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($40 vs $393) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore m7-6Y75Core i5-661
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+892%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($393)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m7-6Y75 and Core i5-661

Intel

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Intel

Core i5-661

The Core i5-661 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,387 points. Launch price was $252.

Processing Power

Both the Core m7-6Y75 and Core i5-661 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-661 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-661 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-661 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Core i5-661's 2,387 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-661. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Core i5-661
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+16%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.33 GHz+178%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,363
2,387+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-661 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Core i5-661
Socket
FCBGA1515
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core m7-6Y75 launched at $393 MSRP, while the Core i5-661 debuted at $196. At current prices ($393 vs $40), the Core i5-661 is $353 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 59.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-661 — making the Core i5-661 the 163.4% better value option.

FeatureCore m7-6Y75Core i5-661
MSRP
$393
$196-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$393
$40-90%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
59.7+895%
Release Date
2015
2010