Core m7-6Y75 vs Celeron G3920
Core m7-6Y75
Celeron G3920
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m7-6Y75 is positioned at rank 1189 and the Celeron G3920 is on rank 364, so the Celeron G3920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3920
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1207%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($393) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron G3920
Core m7-6Y75
The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.
Celeron G3920
The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.
Processing Power
The Core m7-6Y75 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3920's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G3920 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Celeron G3920's 2,358 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+142% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 2,363 | 2,358 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 699 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 948 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3920 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m7-6Y75) / VT-x (Celeron G3920). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core m7-6Y75 launched at $393 MSRP, while the Celeron G3920 debuted at $40. At current prices ($393 vs $30), the Celeron G3920 is $363 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 78.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G3920 — making the Celeron G3920 the 171.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core m7-6Y75 | Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $393 | $40-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $393 | $30-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 78.6+1210% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m7-6Y75 and Celeron G3920
