Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i5-2540M

Core m7-6Y75

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2015

Core i5-2540M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core m7-6Y75

2 / 4

2,363

+0.3%

2,356

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m7-6Y75 is positioned at rank 1189 and the Core i5-2540M is on rank 8, so the Core i5-2540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m7-6Y75

#1177

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4882%

#1178

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4810%

#1179

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

4416%

#1180

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

4396%

#1181

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

4356%

#1183

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

4206%

#1184

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

4033%

#1185

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

4027%

#1186

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3918%

#1189

Core m7-6Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $393

100%

#1190

Core M-5Y10

MSRP: $281|Avg: $20

97%

#1193

Celeron 900

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

94%

#1194

Pentium T3400

MSRP: $150|Avg: $90

94%

#1195

Core 2 Solo SU3500

MSRP: $262|Avg: $15

93%

#1196

Core 2 Duo E8335

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

91%

#1199

Celeron 560

MSRP: $89|Avg: $5

89%

#1200

Core i3-2312M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

88%

#1201

Celeron 857

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

88%

#1202

Celeron 925

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

87%

#1203

Core 2 Duo E8135

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

85%

#1204

Core 2 Duo U7700

MSRP: $262|Avg: $10

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2540M

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

112%

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

110%

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

101%

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

101%

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

100%

#10

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

97%

#11

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

93%

#12

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

92%

#13

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

90%

#17

Core i3-350M

MSRP: $130|Avg: $10

83%

#18

Atom x5-E8000

MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A

82%

#19

Core 2 Duo T5900

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5

81%

#22

Core i3-3130M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

73%

#23

Core 2 Duo T5550

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5

70%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2540M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core m7-6Y75 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core m7-6Y75	Core i5-2540M
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($393)	✅ More affordable ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-2540M stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 97% cheaper ($10 vs $393) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Core m7-6Y75	Core i5-2540M
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+3818%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($393)	✅ More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core m7-6Y75 Benchmark Check

Core i5-2540M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m7-6Y75 and Core i5-2540M

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

Core i5-2540M

The Core i5-2540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,356 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core m7-6Y75 and Core i5-2540M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2540M — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2540M (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core m7-6Y75 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-2540M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m7-6Y75 scores 2,363 against the Core i5-2540M's 2,356 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m7-6Y75 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2540M.

Feature	Core m7-6Y75	Core i5-2540M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+117%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,363	2,356

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m7-6Y75 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2540M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m7-6Y75	Core i5-2540M
Socket	FCBGA1515	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	16
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m7-6Y75) / true (Core i5-2540M). The Core i5-2540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core m7-6Y75 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2540M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660.

Feature	Core m7-6Y75	Core i5-2540M
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core m7-6Y75 launched at $393 MSRP, while the Core i5-2540M debuted at $266. At current prices ($393 vs $10), the Core i5-2540M is $383 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m7-6Y75 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 235.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-2540M — making the Core i5-2540M the 190% better value option.