Core Solo T1350 vs Atom D425

Core Solo T1350

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2006

Atom D425

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core Solo T1350

1 / 1

405

+5.2%

385

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1350 is positioned at rank 1238 and the Atom D425 is on rank 1088, so the Atom D425 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350

#1226

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

14453%

#1227

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

14241%

#1228

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

13074%

#1229

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

13015%

#1230

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

12896%

#1232

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

12453%

#1233

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

11941%

#1234

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

11921%

#1235

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

11601%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

100%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

91%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D425

#1076

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3047%

#1077

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3002%

#1078

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2756%

#1079

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2744%

#1080

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2718%

#1082

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2625%

#1083

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2517%

#1084

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2513%

#1085

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2445%

#1088

Atom D425

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1089

Core i5-3610ME

MSRP: $276|Avg: $22

100%

#1090

Core m3-7Y32

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1092

Celeron B720

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

99%

#1093

Celeron 847

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

98%

#1094

Core i7-2630QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

98%

#1096

Core i7-2635QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

97%

#1097

Celeron 877

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

97%

#1098

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $50

97%

#1099

Core i5-3337U

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

97%

#1100

Core i5-2450M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

96%

#1101

Core i5-7Y57

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1102

Core i5-7Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $100

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Solo T1350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom D425 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Core Solo T1350	Atom D425
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($70)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Core Solo T1350	Atom D425
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($70)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Solo T1350 Benchmark Check

Atom D425 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1350 and Atom D425

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Solo T1350 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D425's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 — a 1.6% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core Solo T1350 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom D425 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Atom D425's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1350	Atom D425
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz+2%	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz+3%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	405+5%	385

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1350 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D425 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.