Core Solo T1350
VS
Core Solo T1300

Core Solo T1350 vs Core Solo T1300

Intel

Core Solo T1350

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core Solo T1300

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1350 is positioned at rank 1238 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Core Solo T1350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350

#1226
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
14453%
#1227
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
14241%
#1228
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
13074%
#1229
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
13015%
#1230
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
12896%
#1232
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
12453%
#1233
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
11941%
#1234
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
11921%
#1235
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
11601%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
100%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
91%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300

#1228
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
15946%
#1229
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
15712%
#1230
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
14424%
#1231
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
14359%
#1232
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
14227%
#1234
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
13739%
#1235
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
13174%
#1236
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
13152%
#1237
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
12799%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
100%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Solo T1350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Solo T1300 in both compute-intensive tasks (5.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Solo T1350Core Solo T1300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core Solo T1300 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $70), it costs 86% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 565% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core Solo T1350.
InsightCore Solo T1350Core Solo T1300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+565%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1350 and Core Solo T1300

Intel

Core Solo T1350

The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1350 and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). Both are built on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Core Solo T1300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz+12%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz+12%
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
405+5%
385
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Core Solo T1300
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Solo T1350 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Core Solo T1300 debuted at $209. At current prices ($70 vs $10), the Core Solo T1300 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1350 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 38.5 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1300 — making the Core Solo T1300 the 147.7% better value option.

FeatureCore Solo T1350Core Solo T1300
MSRP
$200-4%
$209
Avg Price (30d)
$70
$10-86%
Performance per Dollar
5.8
38.5+564%
Release Date
2006
2006