
Core Solo T1350 vs Core Solo T1300

Core Solo T1350

Core Solo T1300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Solo T1350 is positioned at rank 1238 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Core Solo T1350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Solo T1350 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Solo T1350 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+565%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Solo T1350 and Core Solo T1300

Core Solo T1350
The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.

Core Solo T1300
The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core Solo T1350 and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1350 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). Both are built on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Solo T1350 scores 405 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 5.1% lead for the Core Solo T1350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Solo T1350 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.86 GHz+12% | 1.66 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz+12% | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Yonah (2005−2006) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 405+5% | 385 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Core Solo T1350 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Core Solo T1350 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Core Solo T1300 debuted at $209. At current prices ($70 vs $10), the Core Solo T1300 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Solo T1350 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 38.5 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1300 — making the Core Solo T1300 the 147.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core Solo T1350 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-4% | $209 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $10-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 38.5+564% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















