Core Ultra 7 164U vs Core i3-13100T
Core Ultra 7 164U
Core i3-13100T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core Ultra 7 164U is positioned at rank #675 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 164U
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-13100T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 164U | Core i3-13100T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($122) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-U (2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 164U | Core i3-13100T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($122) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 164U and Core i3-13100T
Core Ultra 7 164U
The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.
Core i3-13100T
The Core i3-13100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,798 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 164U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Core i3-13100T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-13100T — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 164U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core i3-13100T uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 164U scores 12,625 against the Core i3-13100T's 12,798 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-13100T. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Core i3-13100T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+200% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+127% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-U (2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 12,625 | 12,798+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,766 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,131 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,973 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 164U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-13100T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Core i3-13100T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2551 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 164U) / not specified (Core i3-13100T). The Core Ultra 7 164U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc), while the Core i3-13100T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 164U | Core i3-13100T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 164U and Core i3-13100T
