EPYC 4464P
Ryzen 9 5900X
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4464P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+21.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 110.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 47,185).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4464P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 110.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4464P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4464P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4464P better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4464P vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 9 5900X share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4464P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4464P scores 47,185 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 19.1% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 47,185+21% | 38,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4464P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4464P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the EPYC 4464P supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4464P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 4464P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4464P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4464P was priced at $429, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($429 vs $549), EPYC 4464P was $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4464P delivers 110.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the EPYC 4464P the 43.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4464P | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-22% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.0+55% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4464P and Ryzen 9 5900X
