EPYC 4484PX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4484PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 35.6 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,756 vs 50,547).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4484PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4484PX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4484PX
The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4484PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — a 5.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 4.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 4484PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4484PX scores 50,547 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+6% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 50,547+2% | 49,756 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4484PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4484PX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). The EPYC 4484PX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4484PX was priced at $599, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($599 vs $1399), EPYC 4484PX was $800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4484PX delivers 84.4 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the EPYC 4484PX the 81.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4484PX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-57% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.4+137% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4484PX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
