
EPYC 4565P

Xeon Platinum 8380
EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4565P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 270W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8380 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($2,010 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,318 vs 64,068).
- ❌58.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4565P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4565P better than Xeon Platinum 8380?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 4565P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 40 / 80+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+68% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+87% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 64,068+3% | 62,318 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 40,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — the EPYC 4565P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8380). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 6144 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $2010), Xeon Platinum 8380 was $720 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Xeon Platinum 8380 the 27.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $2010-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 31.0+32% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















