EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4565P

16 / 32

64,068

+2.8%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 / 64

62,347

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,810 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Delivers 146.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 270W, a 100W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Platinum 8454H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 83 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8454H

2023

Why buy it

✅+28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).
✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (62,347 vs 64,068).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
❌58.8% higher power demand at 270W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4565P better than Xeon Platinum 8454H?

Yes. EPYC 4565P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 24.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4565P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 24.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4565P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4565P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4565P comes in $3,810 cheaper on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $6,540 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 146.2% better value on MSRP (23.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4565P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon Platinum 8454H

The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8454H has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 50.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 4565P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+68%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+105%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	82.5 MB+29%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,068+3%	62,347

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the EPYC 4565P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8454H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) — the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	80+186%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8454H). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H came in at $6540. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $6540), EPYC 4565P was $3810 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the EPYC 4565P the 84.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP	$2730-58%	$6540
Performance per Dollar	23.5+147%	9.5
Release Date	2025	2023

Search EPYC 4565P on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8454H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.