EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375

AMD

EPYC 4584PX

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3375

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4584PX

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +29.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3,434 less on MSRP ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
  • Delivers 232.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
  • Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

  • 128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (59,091 vs 60,169).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
  • 125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
  • Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4584PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Xeon W-3375?
Yes. EPYC 4584PX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 29.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4584PX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 57 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4584PX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 124.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 57 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4584PX is the better buy right now. EPYC 4584PX comes in $3,434 cheaper on MSRP at $1,517 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 232.3% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4584PX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4584PX vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4584PX

The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.

Intel

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4584PX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 35.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 4584PX uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4584PX scores 60,169 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

FeatureEPYC 4584PXXeon W-3375
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
38 / 76+138%
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+43%
4 GHz
Base Clock
4.2 GHz+68%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+125%
57 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-50%
10 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
60,169+2%
59,091
Geekbench 6 Single
1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,713
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4584PX uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the EPYC 4584PX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4584PX) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4584PX) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

FeatureEPYC 4584PXXeon W-3375
Socket
AM5
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5200+63%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4584PX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX) vs true (Xeon W-3375). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureEPYC 4584PXXeon W-3375
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4584PX was priced at $1517, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($1517 vs $4951), EPYC 4584PX was $3434 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4584PX delivers 39.7 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the EPYC 4584PX the 107.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4584PXXeon W-3375
MSRP
$1517-69%
$4951
Performance per Dollar
39.7+234%
11.9
Release Date
2024
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.