EPYC 7302 vs EPYC 7302P

EPYC 7302 vs EPYC 7302P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7302

16 / 32

33,499

+2.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

EPYC 7302P

16 / 32

32,690

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302 vs EPYC 7302P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7302 vs EPYC 7302P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

✅+69.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,192 vs 1,320).
❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while EPYC 7302P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7302P

2019

Why buy it

✅+10.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,500 vs 19,500).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7302 better than EPYC 7302P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7302P is ahead with 10.7% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7302 pulls ahead with 69.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7302 is the stronger fit. You are getting 69.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7302 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7302 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $978 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 69.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that EPYC 7302P is still the better pure gaming CPU with 10.7% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7302 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7302 vs EPYC 7302P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

EPYC 7302P

The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7302P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 14 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the EPYC 7302P's 32,690 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 11,500 (51.6% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 1,320, a 10.2% lead for the EPYC 7302P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 11,450 (11% advantage for the EPYC 7302P). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7302	EPYC 7302P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	33,499+2%	32,690
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500+70%	11,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,192	1,320+11%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,254	11,450+12%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and SP3 (EPYC 7302P).

Feature	EPYC 7302	EPYC 7302P
Socket	SP3	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V, SEV virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230.