
EPYC 7302

Ryzen 7 8745HX
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 8745HX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 8745HX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 8745HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8745HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8745HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8745HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 8745HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7302 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8745HX better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 8745HX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.


Ryzen 7 8745HX
The Ryzen 7 8745HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,620 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8745HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen 7 8745HX's 32,620 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,000 (8% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 2,700, a 77.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8745HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 13,500 (27.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 33,499+3% | 32,620 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500+8% | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | 2,700+127% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | 13,500+32% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses FL1 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8745HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8745HX) — the EPYC 7302 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and FL1 (Ryzen 7 8745HX).
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+6300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8745HX). The Ryzen 7 8745HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen 7 8745HX targets High-end Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen 7 8745HX rivals Core i7-14700HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | High-end Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













