PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7302

2019

Why buy it

✅+8.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8745HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8745HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8745HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 8745HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +48.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7302 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7302

2019

Ryzen 7 8745HX

2025

Why buy it

✅+8.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +48.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7302 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8745HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $978 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8745HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8745HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8745HX better than EPYC 7302?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7302 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8745HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7302 is the better fit. You are getting 8.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8745HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7302 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 8745HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $978 MSRP, and it gives you a 48.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7302 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 8.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. EPYC 7302 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8745HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7302 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 8745HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
1080p
low	154 FPS	254 FPS
medium	126 FPS	236 FPS
high	107 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	218 FPS
medium	106 FPS	183 FPS
high	86 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	152 FPS
medium	55 FPS	127 FPS
high	43 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	86 FPS

Open EPYC 7302 Open Ryzen 7 8745HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
1080p
low	356 FPS	620 FPS
medium	314 FPS	518 FPS
high	262 FPS	428 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	387 FPS
1440p
low	302 FPS	529 FPS
medium	276 FPS	463 FPS
high	235 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	332 FPS
4K
low	194 FPS	310 FPS
medium	178 FPS	277 FPS
high	153 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 7302 Open Ryzen 7 8745HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
1080p
low	642 FPS	816 FPS
medium	523 FPS	735 FPS
high	466 FPS	653 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	560 FPS
1440p
low	497 FPS	701 FPS
medium	404 FPS	564 FPS
high	354 FPS	490 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	415 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	486 FPS
medium	285 FPS	405 FPS
high	244 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	304 FPS

Open EPYC 7302 Open Ryzen 7 8745HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
1080p
low	821 FPS	816 FPS
medium	745 FPS	816 FPS
high	646 FPS	816 FPS
ultra	567 FPS	772 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	816 FPS
medium	572 FPS	755 FPS
high	492 FPS	663 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	579 FPS
4K
low	449 FPS	568 FPS
medium	402 FPS	509 FPS
high	359 FPS	459 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	399 FPS

Open EPYC 7302 Open Ryzen 7 8745HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302 and Ryzen 7 8745HX

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Ryzen 7 8745HX

The Ryzen 7 8745HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,620 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8745HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen 7 8745HX's 32,620 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 7302. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,500 vs 18,000 (8% advantage for the EPYC 7302). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,192 vs 2,700, a 77.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8745HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,254 vs 13,500 (27.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+55%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Dragon Range (2025)
PassMark	33,499+3%	32,620
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,500+8%	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,192	2,700+127%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,254	13,500+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses FL1 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8745HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8745HX) — the EPYC 7302 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and FL1 (Ryzen 7 8745HX).

Feature	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
Socket	SP3	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+6300%	64 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8745HX). The Ryzen 7 8745HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation, Ryzen 7 8745HX targets High-end Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen 7 8745HX rivals Core i7-14700HX.

Feature	EPYC 7302	Ryzen 7 8745HX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 610M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV	AMD-V
Target Use	Server / Multi-thread Workstation	High-end Gaming Laptop