EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
EPYC 7302P
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900XT
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse 2 (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 3900XT
EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.
Ryzen 9 3900XT
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,512 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900XT offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900XT — a 35% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses Matisse 2 (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Ryzen 9 3900XT's 32,512 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7302P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 18,400 (46.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 1,750, a 28% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900XT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 10,500 (8.7% advantage for the EPYC 7302P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900XT.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse 2 (2020) |
| PassMark | 32,690 | 32,512 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500 | 18,400+60% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,320 | 1,750+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,450+9% | 10,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 3900XT). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) — the EPYC 7302P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900XT).
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900XT). Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Ryzen 9 3900XT targets Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen 9 3900XT rivals Core i9-10900K.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Virtualization | Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7302P and Ryzen 9 3900XT
