
EPYC 7302P

Xeon Silver 4510
EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Silver 4510 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Silver 4510 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Silver 4510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4510 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4510 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4510
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,000 vs 11,450).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $563 MSRP, while EPYC 7302P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4510 better than EPYC 7302P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Silver 4510 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.

Xeon Silver 4510
The Xeon Silver 4510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 32,688 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4510 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4510 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4510 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4510 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Xeon Silver 4510's 32,688 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7302P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 1,600, a 19.2% lead for the Xeon Silver 4510 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 11,000 (4% advantage for the EPYC 7302P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4510.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Xeon Silver 4510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+7% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 32,690 | 32,688 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,320 | 1,600+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,450+4% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4510 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302P versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4510 — the Xeon Silver 4510 supports 37.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302P) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4510) — the EPYC 7302P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and FCLGA4677 (Xeon Silver 4510).
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Xeon Silver 4510 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4400+38% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Silver 4510 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4510). Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Xeon Silver 4510 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Xeon Silver 4510 rivals EPYC 8534P.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Xeon Silver 4510 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server / Virtualization | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















