EPYC 7302P
VS
Xeon Platinum 8270

EPYC 7302P vs Xeon Platinum 8270

AMD

EPYC 7302P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8270

26 Cores52 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P

#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
107%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
107%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
106%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
105%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
104%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
103%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
103%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
102%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
102%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
100%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
100%
#236
EPYC 7302P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
99%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
98%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
97%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
97%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
96%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
96%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
93%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
93%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
93%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
92%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8270

#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
128%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
110%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
106%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
106%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
101%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
100%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
100%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
97%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
96%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
94%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
90%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
89%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
87%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
76%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The EPYC 7302P leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon Platinum 8270 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightEPYC 7302PXeon Platinum 8270
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightEPYC 7302PXeon Platinum 8270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302P and Xeon Platinum 8270

AMD

EPYC 7302P

The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8270

The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Xeon Platinum 8270's 33,602 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 32,000 (94.3% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 1,200, a 9.5% lead for the EPYC 7302P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 11,000 (4% advantage for the EPYC 7302P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8270.

FeatureEPYC 7302PXeon Platinum 8270
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
26 / 52+63%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4 GHz+21%
Base Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
35.75 MB (total)+12%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark
32,690
33,602+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,500
32,000+178%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,320+10%
1,200
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,450+4%
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302P) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8270). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302P) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8270) — the EPYC 7302P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8270).

FeatureEPYC 7302PXeon Platinum 8270
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+300%
1024 GB
RAM Channels
8+33%
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+167%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8270 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8270). Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.

FeatureEPYC 7302PXeon Platinum 8270
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Virtualization
Server / Workstation