EPYC 7302P
VS
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

AMD

EPYC 7302P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P

#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
107%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
107%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
106%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
105%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
104%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
103%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
103%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
102%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
102%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
100%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
100%
#236
EPYC 7302P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
99%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
98%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
98%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
97%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
97%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
96%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
96%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
93%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
93%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
93%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
92%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7302PRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7302P (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7302PRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7302P and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

AMD

EPYC 7302P

The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 22,246 (63.7% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 2,864, a 73.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 15,012 (26.9% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

FeatureEPYC 7302PRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+55%
Base Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
32,690
33,619+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,500
22,246+93%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,320
2,864+117%
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,450
15,012+31%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302P versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302P) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the EPYC 7302P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).

FeatureEPYC 7302PRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Socket
SP3
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.

FeatureEPYC 7302PRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use
Server / Virtualization
Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming