EPYC 7302P
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,500 vs 22,246).
- ❌453.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 155W, a 127W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while EPYC 7302P needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7302P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than EPYC 7302P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 22,246 (63.7% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 2,864, a 73.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 15,012 (26.9% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+55% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 32,690 | 33,619+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500 | 22,246+93% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,320 | 2,864+117% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,450 | 15,012+31% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302P versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302P) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) — the EPYC 7302P offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+1500% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7302P | Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Server / Virtualization | Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7302P and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
