EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7302P

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7302P

16 / 32

32,690

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

12 / 24

33,455

+2.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7302P

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,500 vs 18,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,149 MSRP, while EPYC 7302P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX better than EPYC 7302P?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 60.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 60.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019), 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7302P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302P

The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7302P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX — a 26.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX (base: 3 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 7302P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302P scores 32,690 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 — a 2.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 18,500 (46.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,320 vs 1,652, a 22.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,450 vs 11,500 (0.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

Feature	EPYC 7302P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	32,690	33,455+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,500	18,500+61%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,320	1,652+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,450	11,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7302P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7302P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).

Feature	EPYC 7302P	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Socket	SP3	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+100%	2048 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.