EPYC 7303P vs Core Ultra 9 285T
EPYC 7303P
Core Ultra 9 285T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303P
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($594) | ✅ More affordable ($549) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($594) | ✅ More affordable ($549) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303P and Core Ultra 9 285T
EPYC 7303P
The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.
Core Ultra 9 285T
The Core Ultra 9 285T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 36,916 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285T offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285T — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The EPYC 7303P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Core Ultra 9 285T's 36,916 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285T. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285T.
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+71% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+78% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 36,487 | 36,916+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285T — the Core Ultra 9 285T supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 285T). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 20 (Core Ultra 9 285T) — the EPYC 7303P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 9 285T).
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+1500% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 285T). The Core Ultra 9 285T includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Core Ultra 9 285T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7303P launched at $594 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 9 285T debuted at $549. At current prices ($594 vs $549), the Core Ultra 9 285T is $45 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 67.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 285T — making the Core Ultra 9 285T the 9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $594 | $549-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $594 | $549-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.4 | 67.2+9% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7303P and Core Ultra 9 285T
