EPYC 7352 vs Core i5-10400F
EPYC 7352
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7352
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+129%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($725) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7352 and Core i5-10400F
EPYC 7352
The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7352 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7352 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7352 scores 40,370 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 102.4% lead for the EPYC 7352. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32,000 vs 8,191 (118.5% advantage for the EPYC 7352). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,112 vs 1,454, a 26.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,276 vs 5,783 (22.9% advantage for the EPYC 7352). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 40,370+210% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000+291% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,112 | 1,454+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,276+26% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7352 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7352) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7352) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 7352 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-density Computing / Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7352 launched at $1350 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($725 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $623 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7352 delivers 55.7 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 78.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7352 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1350 | $160-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $725 | $102-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.7 | 127.7+129% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7352 and Core i5-10400F
