EPYC 7371
VS
Ryzen AI 9 365

EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

10 Cores20 Thrd28 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI 9 365

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
116%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
109%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 9 365 (2024) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7371Ryzen AI 9 365
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7371 (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7371Ryzen AI 9 365
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Ryzen AI 9 365

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 365 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 365. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.

FeatureEPYC 7371Ryzen AI 9 365
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+60%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
5 GHz+32%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+55%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+167%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
30,156
30,187
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,216
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,941
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 365). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 365) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureEPYC 7371Ryzen AI 9 365
Socket
TR4
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+3100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 365). The Ryzen AI 9 365 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 880M), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureEPYC 7371Ryzen AI 9 365
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 880M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
AMD-V
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads
Mobile AI