
EPYC 7371

Ryzen AI 9 365
EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen AI 9 365 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen AI 9 365 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen AI 9 365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7371
2018Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,156 vs 30,187).
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 365 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 365 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 200W, a 172W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 880M, while EPYC 7371 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7371, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 365 better than EPYC 7371?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen AI 9 365 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7371
The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.


Ryzen AI 9 365
The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 365 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 365. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+60% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+55% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+167% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Strix Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,156 | 30,187 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,216 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,941 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Ryzen AI 9 365). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 365) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+110% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+3100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+540% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 365). The Ryzen AI 9 365 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 880M), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 880M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | Mobile AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













