EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 6357P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6357P

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 6357P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7371

16 / 32

30,156

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon 6357P

8 / 16

30,401

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 6357P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 6357P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,216 vs 2,784).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,000).
❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6357P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅+128.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than EPYC 7371?

Yes. Xeon 6357P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6357P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6357P is the stronger fit. You are getting 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6357P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 6357P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6357P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon 6357P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6357P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon 6357P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 18,000 (18.2% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 2,784, a 78.4% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 12,769 (59.1% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	EPYC 7371	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	5.1 GHz+34%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,156	30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	18,000+20%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,216	2,784+129%
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,941	12,769+84%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P — the Xeon 6357P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Xeon 6357P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 20 (Xeon 6357P) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	EPYC 7371	Xeon 6357P
Socket	TR4	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+1500%	128 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6357P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.