
EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Platinum 8180M

EPYC 7371

Xeon Platinum 8180M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8180M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Platinum 8180M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Platinum 8180M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Xeon Platinum 8180M

EPYC 7371
The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Xeon Platinum 8180M
The Xeon Platinum 8180M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 30,313 points. Launch price was $13,011.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Xeon Platinum 8180M's 30,313 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8180M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 25,000 (50% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 1,000, a 19.5% lead for the EPYC 7371 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 21,854 (103.6% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180M.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Platinum 8180M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+24% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+66% | 38.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 30,156 | 30,313 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000 | 25,000+67% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,216+22% | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,941 | 21,854+215% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180M). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) — the EPYC 7371 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and C620 (Xeon Platinum 8180M).
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Platinum 8180M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+33% | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8180M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8180M). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Xeon Platinum 8180M targets Mission Critical Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134; Xeon Platinum 8180M rivals EPYC 7551.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Platinum 8180M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | Mission Critical Datacenter |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















