EPYC 7371 vs Xeon W-3265

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon W-3265 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7371

16 / 32

30,156

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon W-3265

24 / 48

30,105

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon W-3265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon W-3265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 205W, a 5W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3265

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (30,105 vs 30,156).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,684 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3265 better than EPYC 7371?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3265 is ahead with a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7371 also has the bigger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3265 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3265 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $3,684 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7371 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3265 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7371 vs Xeon W-3265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Xeon W-3265

The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 19% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7371. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.

Feature	EPYC 7371	Xeon W-3265
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.6 GHz+21%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+15%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+94%	33 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+2033%	24 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,156	30,105
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,216	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,941	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the Xeon W-3265 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the EPYC 7371 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).

Feature	EPYC 7371	Xeon W-3265
Socket	TR4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+100%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7371 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs true (Xeon W-3265). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.