
EPYC 7371

Xeon Gold 5220R
EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Gold 5220R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Gold 5220R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7371
2018Why buy it
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,216 vs 1,327).
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,156 vs 30,372).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Xeon Gold 5220R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+9.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,780 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5220R better than EPYC 7371?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7371 vs Xeon Gold 5220R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7371
The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Xeon Gold 5220R
The Xeon Gold 5220R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 30,372 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5220R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220R — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5220R (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Xeon Gold 5220R's 30,372 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220R. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 1,327, a 8.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220R that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220R.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+2033% | 24 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,156 | 30,372 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,216 | 1,327+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,941 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5220R — the Xeon Gold 5220R supports 0% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5220R). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5220R) — the EPYC 7371 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and C620 (Xeon Gold 5220R).
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+100% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+167% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon Gold 5220R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs Yes (Xeon Gold 5220R). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | EPYC 7371 | Xeon Gold 5220R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | Yes |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server Workloads | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















