
EPYC 7402

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅+54.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +48.5% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,334 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 28,546).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 39.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 29.2% lead for the EPYC 7402. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 28,546 vs 18,500 (42.7% advantage for the EPYC 7402). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,299 vs 2,700, a 70.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,622 vs 15,000 (17.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 5 GHz+49% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 46,012+34% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,546+54% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,299 | 2,700+108% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,622 | 15,000+19% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 7402 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 7402 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7402 was priced at $1783, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($1783 vs $449), Ryzen 7 7800X3D was $1334 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 99% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1783 | $449-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8 | 76.4+196% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














