EPYC 74F3
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 74F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Costs $986 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 31.6 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 350W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,054 vs 60,666).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.6 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ❌45.8% higher power demand at 350W vs 240W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 74F3 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 74F3
The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,054 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Processing Power
The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 74F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — a 28% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX's 60,054 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 74F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 60,666+1% | 60,054 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,079 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 74F3 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 74F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX).
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+300% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 74F3) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX came in at $1899. On launch pricing ($913 vs $1899), EPYC 74F3 was $986 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — making the EPYC 74F3 the 71% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913-52% | $1899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.4+110% | 31.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
