EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 5415+

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7501

32 / 64

24,925

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 5415+

8 / 16

24,842

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 5415+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7501

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5415+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5415+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Gold 5415+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 150W instead of 155W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,842 vs 24,925).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5415+ better than EPYC 7501?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5415+ is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7501 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7501 also has the bigger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7501 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 184.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 23 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5415+ still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5415+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5415+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7501 vs Xeon Gold 5415+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7501

The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.

Xeon Gold 5415+

The Xeon Gold 5415+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,842 points. Launch price was $1,076.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7501 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5415+ offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5415+ — a 31% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5415+ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7501 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7501 scores 24,925 against the Xeon Gold 5415+'s 24,842 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7501. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501 vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5415+.

Feature	EPYC 7501	Xeon Gold 5415+
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.1 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+184%	22.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	24,925	24,842

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7501 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5415+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.