
EPYC 7513
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7513
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($2,840 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6442Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,534 vs 59,745).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌1.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,878 MSRPvs$2,840 MSRP
EPYC 7513
2021Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($2,840 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6442Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,534 vs 59,745).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌1.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,878 MSRPvs$2,840 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7513 better than Xeon Gold 6442Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 705 FPS | 998 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 940 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 853 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 718 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 645 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 325 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 990 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 898 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 774 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 670 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 763 FPS |
| medium | 664 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 568 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 489 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7513 and Xeon Gold 6442Y

EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Xeon Gold 6442Y
The Xeon Gold 6442Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,534 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7513 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6442Y (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7513 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7513 scores 59,745 against the Xeon Gold 6442Y's 58,534 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 7513. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6442Y.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.65 GHz | 4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+113% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 59,745+2% | 58,534 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7513 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7513 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — the Xeon Gold 6442Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7513) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6442Y) — the EPYC 7513 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7513) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6442Y).
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6442Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 6442Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7513 launched at $2840 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($2840 vs $2878), the EPYC 7513 is $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7513 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 20.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6442Y — making the EPYC 7513 the 3.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7513 | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2840-1% | $2878 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0+3% | 20.3 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













