
EPYC 7552

Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 7552 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7552 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7552 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7552
2019Why buy it
- ✅+156% higher PassMark.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,696 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 377.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,414).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 192 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7552, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 7552?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7552 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552
The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 87.6% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+500% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+500% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 57,414+156% | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7552) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 7552 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7552) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $3696 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 130.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4025 | $329-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 68.2+377% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














