EPYC 7773X
Xeon Platinum 8592+
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8592+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+140% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 320 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($8,800 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7773X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 91,340).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (320 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7773X better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8592+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7773X and Xeon Platinum 8592+ share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 8.4% lead for the EPYC 7773X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+16% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+140% | 320 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 91,340+9% | 84,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 102300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the EPYC 7773X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4096 TB+102300% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7773X was priced at $8800, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ came in at $11600. On launch pricing ($8800 vs $11600), EPYC 7773X was $2800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the EPYC 7773X the 35.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800-24% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4+44% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7773X and Xeon Platinum 8592+
