EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon 6515P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7F52

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6515P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon 6515P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F52

16 / 32

41,388

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6515P

16 / 32

40,720

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon 6515P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon 6515P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F52

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 55.0 PassMark/$ ($3,100 MSRP vs $740 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 240W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon 6515P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6515P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,360 less on MSRP ($740 MSRP vs $3,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 312.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.0 vs 13.4 PassMark/$ ($740 MSRP vs $3,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 240W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F52 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (40,720 vs 41,388).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F52 better than Xeon 6515P?

Yes. EPYC 7F52 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7F52 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 72 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7F52 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 255.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 72 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F52 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6515P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7F52 comes in 318.9% more expensive on MSRP at $3,100 MSRP versus $740 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6515P is also 312.2% better value on MSRP (55.0 vs 13.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6515P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7F52 vs Xeon 6515P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F52

The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.

Xeon 6515P

The Xeon 6515P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 40,720 points. Launch price was $740.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7F52 and Xeon 6515P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6515P — a 2.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F52 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 7F52 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon 6515P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F52 scores 41,388 against the Xeon 6515P's 40,720 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7F52. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6515P.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	Xeon 6515P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+3%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+256%	72 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	41,388+2%	40,720

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F52 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6515P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6515P — the Xeon 6515P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F52) vs 88 (Xeon 6515P) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F52) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6515P).

Feature	EPYC 7F52	Xeon 6515P
Socket	SP3	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7F52) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6515P). Direct competitor: EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Xeon 6515P rivals EPYC 9534.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	Xeon 6515P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F52 was priced at $3100, while the Xeon 6515P came in at $740. On launch pricing ($3100 vs $740), Xeon 6515P was $2360 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F52 delivers 13.4 pts/$ vs 55.0 pts/$ for the Xeon 6515P — making the Xeon 6515P the 121.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F52	Xeon 6515P
MSRP	$3100	$740-76%
Performance per Dollar	13.4	55.0+310%
Release Date	2020	2025

Search EPYC 7F52 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6515P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.