EPYC 8024P
VS
Core Ultra 9 288V

EPYC 8024P vs Core Ultra 9 288V

AMD

EPYC 8024P

8 Cores16 Thrd90 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

8 Cores8 Thrd30 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8024P

#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
108%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
108%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
108%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
108%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
107%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
106%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
106%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
106%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
105%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
104%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
101%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
101%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
101%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
100%
#327
EPYC 8024P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
99%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
99%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
98%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
98%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
96%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
96%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
95%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
95%
#337
EPYC 7F72
MSRP: $2131|Avg: $2131
94%
#338
Xeon W-2265
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $663
94%
#339
Xeon w7-3555
MSRP: $2749|Avg: $2199
94%
#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
94%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
94%
#342
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
MSRP: $3899|Avg: $3971.7
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 288V

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
119%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
116%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
114%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
114%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
110%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
108%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 8024P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 8024PCore Ultra 9 288V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 288V ($600), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($600 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 8024PCore Ultra 9 288V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8024P and Core Ultra 9 288V

AMD

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8024P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 288V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.

FeatureEPYC 8024PCore Ultra 9 288V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3 GHz
5.1 GHz+70%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
Process
5 nm
3 nm-40%
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
20,455
20,280
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,300
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 8024PCore Ultra 9 288V
Socket
SP6
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 8024P) / true (Core Ultra 9 288V). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureEPYC 8024PCore Ultra 9 288V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true