CPU
GPU
EPYC 9015
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9015
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9015 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9015 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9015 and Core i5-10400F
EPYC 9015
The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9015 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 80.3% lead for the EPYC 9015. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 8,191 (58.7% advantage for the EPYC 9015). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,454, a 3.8% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 5,783 (62.2% advantage for the EPYC 9015). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+433% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,505+134% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000+83% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400 | 1,454+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000+90% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the EPYC 9015 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 9015 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9015 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9015 and Core i5-10400F
