
EPYC 9015

Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9015
2024Why buy it
- ✅+36% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 30,505).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9015, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 9015 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9015 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 9015?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015
The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9015 and Ryzen 7 3700X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 30.5% lead for the EPYC 9015. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,505+36% | 22,430 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9015 supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9015 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+88% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.
| Feature | EPYC 9015 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | — |
| Target Use | Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













