EPYC 9174F
Ryzen 9 7900X
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 9 7900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 9 7900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9174F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅Costs $355 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 93.5 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7900X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 320W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9174F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,329 vs 52,249).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9174F, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 93.5 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9174F better than Ryzen 9 7900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 9 7900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Ryzen 9 7900X
The Ryzen 9 7900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,329 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 9174F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X (base: 4.1 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Ryzen 9 7900X's 51,329 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 52,249+2% | 51,329 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 29,557 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7900X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7900X — the Ryzen 9 7900X supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7900X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7900X) — the EPYC 9174F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X).
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7900X). The Ryzen 9 7900X includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7900X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 9 7900X rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Ryzen 9 7900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($194 vs $549), EPYC 9174F was $355 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 269.3 pts/$ vs 93.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900X — making the EPYC 9174F the 96.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen 9 7900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194-65% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 269.3+188% | 93.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9174F and Ryzen 9 7900X
