EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w5-2565X

18 Cores36 Thrd240 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9174F

16 / 32

52,249

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon w5-2565X

18 / 36

52,378

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9174F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,195 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Delivers 614.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 37.7 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (52,249 vs 52,378).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 240W.

Xeon w5-2565X

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 240W instead of 320W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($1,389 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2565X better than EPYC 9174F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9174F is ahead with a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2565X pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 9174F also has the bigger cache pool with 582.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2565X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-2565X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9174F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w5-2565X comes in 616.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,389 MSRP versus $194 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9174F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9174F is also 614.2% better value on MSRP (269.3 vs 37.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2565X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 18 cores / 36 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Xeon w5-2565X

The Xeon w5-2565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,378 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2565X offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon w5-2565X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2565X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2565X (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Xeon w5-2565X's 52,378 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w5-2565X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w5-2565X.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w5-2565X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	18 / 36+13%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+28%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+583%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	52,249	52,378

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2565X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2565X) — the EPYC 9174F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and W790 (Xeon w5-2565X).

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w5-2565X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w5-2565X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w5-2565X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Xeon w5-2565X came in at $1389. On launch pricing ($194 vs $1389), EPYC 9174F was $1195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 269.3 pts/$ vs 37.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2565X — making the EPYC 9174F the 150.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP	$194-86%	$1389
Performance per Dollar	269.3+614%	37.7
Release Date	2022	2024

Search EPYC 9174F on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-2565X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.