EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w5-2565X
EPYC 9174F
Xeon w5-2565X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w5-2565X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,389) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+4519%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,389) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9174F and Xeon w5-2565X
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Xeon w5-2565X
The Xeon w5-2565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,378 points. Launch price was $1,339.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w5-2565X offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon w5-2565X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2565X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2565X (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Xeon w5-2565X's 52,378 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w5-2565X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w5-2565X.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+28% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+583% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,249 | 52,378 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2565X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2565X) — the EPYC 9174F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and W790 (Xeon w5-2565X).
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-2565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w5-2565X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9174F launched at $194 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-2565X debuted at $1389. At current prices ($30 vs $1389), the EPYC 9174F is $1359 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 1741.6 pts/$ vs 37.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2565X — making the EPYC 9174F the 191.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194-86% | $1389 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-98% | $1389 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1741.6+4520% | 37.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9174F and Xeon w5-2565X
