EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6348

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Gold 6348

28 Cores56 Thrd235 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6348 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9174F

16 / 32

52,249

+0.8%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon Gold 6348

28 / 56

51,843

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9174F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,389 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1761.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌36.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 235W.

Xeon Gold 6348

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 235W instead of 320W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (51,843 vs 52,249).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9174F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9174F better than Xeon Gold 6348?

Yes. EPYC 9174F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9174F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 28.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 42 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9174F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 509.5% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 42 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9174F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9174F comes in $3,389 cheaper on MSRP at $194 MSRP versus $3,583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1761.4% better value on MSRP (269.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9174F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 42 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Xeon Gold 6348

The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9174F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon Gold 6348
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+26%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+58%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+510%	42 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	52,249	51,843

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6348 — the EPYC 9174F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6348). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the EPYC 9174F offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon Gold 6348
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon Gold 6348
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Xeon Gold 6348 came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($194 vs $3583), EPYC 9174F was $3389 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 269.3 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6348 — making the EPYC 9174F the 179.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon Gold 6348
MSRP	$194-95%	$3583
Performance per Dollar	269.3+1757%	14.5
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 9174F on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6348 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.