EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w7-2475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-2475X

20 Cores40 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w7-2475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9174F

16 / 32

52,249

0.0%

Ryzen 9 7940H

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon w7-2475X

20 / 40

53,211

+1.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w7-2475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w7-2475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9174F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,595 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $1,789 MSRP).
✅Delivers 805.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 29.7 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $1,789 MSRP).
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (52,249 vs 53,211).
❌42.2% higher power demand at 320W vs 225W.

Xeon w7-2475X

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 225W instead of 320W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.7 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($1,789 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-2475X better than EPYC 9174F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9174F is ahead with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2475X pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark. EPYC 9174F also has the bigger cache pool with 582.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-2475X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9174F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-2475X comes in 822.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,789 MSRP versus $194 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 9174F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9174F is also 805.5% better value on MSRP (269.3 vs 29.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-2475X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 9174F vs Xeon w7-2475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Xeon w7-2475X

The Xeon w7-2475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $1,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2475X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-2475X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2475X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2475X (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Xeon w7-2475X's 53,211 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon w7-2475X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w7-2475X.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w7-2475X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	4.1 GHz+58%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+583%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	52,249	53,211+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (Xeon w7-2475X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 112 (Xeon w7-2475X) — the EPYC 9174F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and W790 (Xeon w7-2475X).

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w7-2475X
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-2475X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon w7-2475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w7-2475X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Xeon w7-2475X came in at $1789. On launch pricing ($194 vs $1789), EPYC 9174F was $1595 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 269.3 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2475X — making the EPYC 9174F the 160.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9174F	Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP	$194-89%	$1789
Performance per Dollar	269.3+807%	29.7
Release Date	2022	2023

Search EPYC 9174F on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.