EPYC 9174F
Xeon Gold 6418H
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6418H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6418H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6418H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9174F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $194 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6418H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌73% higher power demand at 320W vs 185W.
Xeon Gold 6418H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 320W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,711 vs 52,249).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9174F better than Xeon Gold 6418H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Gold 6418H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Xeon Gold 6418H
The Xeon Gold 6418H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,711 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6418H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6418H — a 9.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9174F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Xeon Gold 6418H's 51,711 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6418H.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+95% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+327% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,249+1% | 51,711 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6418H — the Xeon Gold 6418H supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6418H). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6418H) — the EPYC 9174F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6418H).
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6418H rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9174F and Xeon Gold 6418H
