EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen 7 5700X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9175F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9175F

16 / 32

65,894

+147.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 / 16

26,609

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9175F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($4,256 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,957 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Delivers 474.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,256 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9175F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 65,894).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9175F, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9175F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9175F better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9175F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9175F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 512 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9175F is the stronger fit. You are getting 147.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9175F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9175F comes in 1323.4% more expensive on MSRP at $4,256 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 474.8% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9175F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 512 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9175F vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9175F

The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9175F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9175F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 8.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 9175F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9175F scores 65,894 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 84.9% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+9%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+24%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+1500%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-43%	7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	65,894+148%	26,609
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9175F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the EPYC 9175F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the EPYC 9175F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9175F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9175F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the EPYC 9175F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9175F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	SP5	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+100%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+3100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9175F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9175F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9175F was priced at $4256, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($4256 vs $299), Ryzen 7 5700X was $3957 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9175F delivers 15.5 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 140.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9175F	Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP	$4256	$299-93%
Performance per Dollar	15.5	89.0+474%
Release Date	2024	2022

Search EPYC 9175F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.