EPYC 9224 vs Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC 9224
Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9224
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+283%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,199) | ✅ More affordable ($320) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9224 and Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC 9224
The EPYC 9224 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,573 points. Launch price was $1,825.
Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9224 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265 offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 9224 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9224 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9224 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9224 scores 48,573 against the Core Ultra 7 265's 49,666 — a 2.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9224 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+20% | 20 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+113% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,573 | 49,666+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9224 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9224 versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265 — the Core Ultra 7 265 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9224 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9224) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9224) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) — the EPYC 9224 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9224) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265).
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+2300% | 256 |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9224) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265). The Core Ultra 7 265 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC 9224 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9224 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9224 launched at $1825 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265 debuted at $384. At current prices ($1199 vs $320), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $879 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9224 delivers 40.5 pts/$ vs 155.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265 — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 117.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9224 | Core Ultra 7 265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1825 | $384-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1199 | $320-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.5 | 155.2+283% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9224 and Core Ultra 7 265
